Much
of the decline in the incidence and fatality rates of infectious
diseases is attributable to public health measures especially
immunization, improved sanitation, and better nutrition.
Immunization remains
the best means of preventing many infectious diseases. Recommended
immunization schedules for children and adolescents can be found online
at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/child-schedule .htm and
the schedule for adults is outlined in Table 30–7. Substantial
vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality continue to occur among
adults from vaccine-preventable diseases, such as hepatitis A, hepatitis
B, influenza, and pneumococcal infections. For example, in adults in
the United States, there are an estimated 50,000–70,000 deaths annually
from influenza, hepatitis B, and invasive pneumococcal disease.
Strategies to enhance vaccinations include increasing community demand
for vaccinations; enhancing access to vaccination services; and
provider- or systembased interventions, such as reminder systems.
Evidence suggests annual influenza vaccination
is safe and effective with potential benefit in all age groups, and the
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends routine
influenza vaccination for all persons aged 6 months and older, including
all adults. When vaccine supply is limited, certain groups should be
given priority, such as adults 50 years and older, individuals with
chronic illness or immunosuppression, and pregnant women. An alternative
high-dose inactivated vaccine for adults 65 years and older is
available. This inactivated trivalent vaccine contains 60 mcg of
hemagglutinin antigen per influenza vaccine virus strain (Fluzone
High-Dose [Sanofi Pasteur]). Adults 65 years and older can receive
either the standard dose or high-dose vaccine, whereas those younger
than 65 years should receive a standard-dose preparation.
Increasing reports of pertussis
among US adolescents, adults, and their infant contacts have stimulated
vaccine development for older age groups. A safe and effective
tetanus-diphtheria 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) is
available for use in adolescents and in adults younger than 65 years.
Compared with DTaP, which is used in children under the age of 7, Tdap
has a reduced dose of the diphtheria and pertussis vaccines. The ACIP
recommends routine use of a single dose of Tdap for adults aged 19–64
years to replace the next booster dose of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids
vaccine (Td). Due to increasing reports of pertussis in the United
States, clinicians may choose to give Tdap to persons aged 65 years and
older despite limited published data on the safety and efficacy of the
vaccine in this age group.
Both hepatitis A vaccine
and immune globulin provide protection against hepatitis A; however,
administration of immune globulin may provide a modest benefit over
vaccination in some settings. A recombinant protein hepatitis E vaccine has been developed that has proven safe and efficacious in preventing hepatitis E among highrisk populations.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines
have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing persistent HPV
infections, and thus may impact the rate of cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia (CIN) II–III. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
recommends routine HPV vaccination for girls aged 11–12 years. The AAP
also recommends that all unvaccinated girls and women ages 13–26 years
receive the HPV vaccine. It is estimated that routine use of HPV
vaccination of females at 11 to 12 years of age and catch-up vaccination
of females at age 13–16 (with vaccination of girls age 9 and 10 at the
discretion of the physician) could prevent 95% to 100% of CIN and
adenocarcinoma in situ, 99% of genital warts and approximately 70% of
cervical cancer cases worldwide; thus, the role of HPV testing will need
redefinition. In October 2011, the ACIP approved recommendations for
routine vaccination of males 11 or 12 years of age with three doses of
HPV4 (quadrivalent vaccine). Vaccination of males with HPV may lead to
indirect protection of women by reducing transmission of HPV. Despite
the effectiveness of the vaccine, rates of immunization are low.
Interventions addressing personal beliefs and system barriers to
vaccinations may help address the slow adoption of this vaccine.
Persons
traveling to countries where infections are endemic should take
precautions described in Chapter 30. Immunization
registries—confidential, population-based, computerized information
systems that collect vaccination data about all residents of a
geographic area—can be used to increase and sustain high vaccination
coverage.
Skin testing for tuberculosis
(see Table 9–16) and treating selected patients reduce the risk of
reactivation tuberculosis. Two blood tests, which are not confounded by
prior BCG (bacille Calmette-Guérin) vaccination, have been developed to
detect tuberculosis infection by measuring in vitro T-cell
interferon-gamma release in response to two antigens (the enzyme-linked
immunospot [ELISpot], [T-SPOT.TB] and the other, a quantitative ELISA
[QuantiFERON-TBGold] test). These T-cell–based assays have an excellent
specificity that is higher than tuberculin skin testing in
BCG-vaccinated populations. The rate of tuberculosis in the United
States has been declining since 1992. In 2009, the US tuberculosis rate
was 3.8 cases per 100,000 population, a decrease of 11.4% from the 2008
rate (4.2 per 100,000). This represents the greatest single-year
decrease ever recorded and was the lowest
recorded rate since national tuberculosis surveillance began in 1953.
recorded rate since national tuberculosis surveillance began in 1953.
The Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis has called for a renewed commitment to
eliminating tuberculosis in the United States, and the Institute of Medicine has published a detailed plan for achieving that goal. Patients with HIV infection are at an especially high risk for tuberculosis, and tuberculosis preventive therapy in the era of HIV will require further work to overcome implementation barriers and to identify optimal duration of preventive therapy and treatment approach for individuals receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).
eliminating tuberculosis in the United States, and the Institute of Medicine has published a detailed plan for achieving that goal. Patients with HIV infection are at an especially high risk for tuberculosis, and tuberculosis preventive therapy in the era of HIV will require further work to overcome implementation barriers and to identify optimal duration of preventive therapy and treatment approach for individuals receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).
Treatment
of tuberculosis poses a risk of hepatotoxicity and thus requires close
monitoring of liver transaminases. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
monitoring during the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection is
recommended for certain individuals (preexisting liver disease,
pregnancy, chronic alcohol consumption). ALT should be monitored in
HIV-infected patients during treatment of tuberculosis disease and
should be considered in patients over the age of 35. Symptomatic
patients with an ALT elevation three times the upper limit of normal
(ULN) or asymptomatic patients with an elevation five times the ULN should be treated with a modified or alternative regimen.
In
2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated
guidelines for the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted
diseases. Highlights of these guidelines include updated treatments for
bacterial vaginosis and genital warts as well as antibiotic-resistant
Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the prevalence of which has risen.
HIV infection
is a major infectious disease problem in the world, and it affects
850,000–950,000 persons in the United States. Since sexual contact is a
common mode of transmission, primary prevention relies on eliminating
unsafe sexual behavior by promoting abstinence, later onset of first
sexual activity, decreased number of partners, and use of latex condoms.
Appropriately used, condoms can reduce the rate of HIV transmission by
nearly 70%. In one study, couples with one infected partner who used
condoms inconsistently had a considerable risk of infection: the rate of
seroconversion was estimated to be 13% after 24 months. No
seroconversions were noted with consistent condom use. Unfortunately, as
many as one-third of HIV-positive persons continue unprotected sexual
practices after learning that they are HIV-infected. Preexposure
prophylaxis with antiretroviral drugs in men who have sex with men could
have a major impact on preventing HIV infection, and studies evaluating
the impact in other groups are underway. Postexposure prophylaxis is
widely used after occupational and nonoccupational contact, and it has been estimated to reduce the risk of transmission by approximately 80%.
With
regard to secondary prevention, many HIVinfected persons in the United
States receive the diagnosis at advanced stages of immunosuppression,
and almost all will progress to AIDS if untreated. On the other hand,
HAART substantially reduces the risk of clinical progression or death in
patients with advanced immunosuppression. Screening tests for HIV are
extremely (> 99%) accurate. While the benefits of HIV screening
appear to outweigh its harms, current screening is generally based on
individual patient risk factors. Such screening can identify persons at
risk for AIDS but misses a substantial proportion of those infected.
Nonetheless, the yield from screening higher prevalence populations is
substantially greater than that from screening the general population,
and more widespread screening of the population remains controversial.
and more widespread screening of the population remains controversial.
In
immunocompromised patients, live vaccines are contraindicated but many
killed or component vaccines are safe and recommended. Asymptomatic
HIV-infected patients have not shown adverse consequences when given live MMR and influenza vaccinations as well as tetanus, hepatitis B, H influenza type b and pneumococcal vaccinations—all should be given. However, if poliomyelitis immunization is required, the inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine is indicated. In symptomatic HIV-infected patients, live virus vaccines such as MMR should generally be avoided, but annual influenza vaccination is safe.
Whenever possible, immunizations should be completed before procedures that require or induce immunosuppression (organ transplantation or chemotherapy), or that reduce immunogenic responses (splenectomy). However, if this is not possible, the patient may mount only a partial immune response, yet even this partial response can be beneficial. Patients who undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplantation lose preexisting immunities and should be revaccinated. In many situations, family members should also be vaccinated to protect the immunocompromised patient, although oral live polio vaccine should be avoided because of the risk of infecting the patient.
Herpes zoster, caused by reactivation from previous varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection, affects many older adults and people with immune system dysfunction. Whites are at higher risk than other ethnic groups and the incidence in adults age 65 and older may be higher than previously described. It can cause postherpetic neuralgia, a potentially debilitating chronic pain syndrome. A varicella vaccine is available for the prevention of herpes zoster. Several clinical trials have shown that this vaccine (Zostavax) is safe, elevates VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity, and significantly reduces the incidence of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in persons older than 60 years. In one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among more than 38,000 older adults, the vaccine reduced the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia by 66% and the incidence of herpes zoster by 51%. The ACIP recommends routine zoster vaccination, administered as a one-time subcutaneous dose (0.65 mL), of all persons aged 60 years or older. Persons who report a previous episode of zoster can
be vaccinated; however, the vaccine is contraindicated in immunocompromised (primary or acquired) individuals. The durability of vaccine response and whether any booster vaccination is needed are still uncertain. The cost effectiveness of the vaccine varies substantially, and the patient’s age should be considered in vaccine recommendations. One study reported a cost-effectiveness exceeding $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year saved. Despite its availability, uptake of the vaccine remains low at 2–7% nationally. Financial barriers (cost, limited knowledge of reimbursement) have had a significant impact on its underutilization.
be vaccinated; however, the vaccine is contraindicated in immunocompromised (primary or acquired) individuals. The durability of vaccine response and whether any booster vaccination is needed are still uncertain. The cost effectiveness of the vaccine varies substantially, and the patient’s age should be considered in vaccine recommendations. One study reported a cost-effectiveness exceeding $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year saved. Despite its availability, uptake of the vaccine remains low at 2–7% nationally. Financial barriers (cost, limited knowledge of reimbursement) have had a significant impact on its underutilization.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), previously recognized as a nosocomial pathogen, has emerged as a common cause of staphylococcal infection in the outpatient setting; it accounts for more than 50% of outpatient staphylococcal infections. Community-acquired (CA)-MRSA strains affect healthy individuals, and the burden of disease can range from a furuncle to more severe life-threatening infections. Treatment of CA-MRSA is different from nosocomial MRSA because CA-MRSA strains typically retain susceptibility to antibiotics that are ineffective in treating nosocomial strains.
No comments:
Post a Comment